On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 13:48:17 -0600, "Dallas L. Engelken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ############################################################ > # SUBJ_SPELLING_00 -- 2283s/1850h of 10971 corpus, 2003-12-30 > # > ############################################################ This doesn't tell me much. How many spams and hams are in the corpus? This would be a spectacular rule if the corpus is 23% spam --- it would catch nearly every one. If on the other hand, the corpus was 80% spam, this would be a bad rule --- it would have caught nearly every ham. Could others who report rules test results please state what percentage of their corpus is spam/ham? Scott ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
