On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Rich Wales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I came up with a set of rules which appear to catch the new strain > of spam with a meaningless jumble of words in the body, [...] > header __MPOP_SUBJ1 Subject =~ /Re: [A-Z]+, \S+ \S+ \S+/
You may want to compare/contrast the one in my rnd_uc_char.cf ruleset; the [A-Z]+, in your rule doesn't catch some of the cases I've seen. http://kepler.acns.bethel.edu/~bjn/spamassassin/ On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Robert Menschel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The single rule I use for these is: > > header RM_hxm_mPOPwebMail X-Mailer =~ /mPOP Web-Mail/ > > I don't find any indication anywhere on the Web that mPOP is used for > anything but spam. Thanks for the corpus data on this; I've been wondering about that. I have that in my ruleset now. -- Brent J. Nordquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> N0BJN Other contact information: http://kepler.acns.bethel.edu/~bjn/contact.html * Fast pipe * Always on * Get out of the way - Tim Bray http://tinyurl.com/7sti ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
