What's the proper way to suggest a new filter to the SA developers?
I'm getting a TON of mail with a bunch of random uncommon-but-real words to thwart Bayesian filtering, combined with a single picture link. Spamassassin is giving these only about one point apiece.
The picture link never seems to come from the same domain as the mail. It seems like HTML mail with images not from the sender's domain would be a very useful test for these.
My gut feeling is that would not be a very good rule. Most HTML newsletters use off-domain hosting for their images, so I think the S/O on this rule is going to be near 0.50.. however, that would remain to be seen in reality.
In any event, developer suggestions are covered in the FAQ: http://wiki.spamassassin.org/w/ContributingNewRules
Admittedly more targeted to someone who has already written a rule, it's still got the information you need.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
