On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Charles Gregory wrote:

> Right now, there would be no statistics, because the text obfu has just
> started. But as a side note, we don't have the disk space to run Bayes for
> all our users.... though I'm getting awfully tempted to talk the boss into
> an extra disk or two. So for now, no Bayes here.... :-(

A site-wide Bayes isn't quite as effective as a per-user Bayes,
but still worthwhile. It will help to catch the obfu junk (and
only takes 10~20 Mbytes of disk).

So now you have no excuse, get Bayes-ing.  ;)


-- 
Dave Funk                                  University of Iowa
<dbfunk (at) engineering.uiowa.edu>        College of Engineering
319/335-5751   FAX: 319/384-0549           1256 Seamans Center
Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_admin            Iowa City, IA 52242-1527
#include <std_disclaimer.h>
Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to