Hello John, Monday, January 26, 2004, 5:10:32 AM, you wrote:
JW> It struck me that since individual tripwire rules are at risk of FPs, JW> but that multiple tripwire hits on the same message are much less so, JW> it might be worthwhile assigning a significantly higher score to JW> messages that hit lots of tripwire rules. JW> Since there are so many rules involved, I've created a set of JW> intermediate meta rules, as follows: Section 3 -- Frequencies Log (First numeric frequencies, followed by percentage frequencies) OVERALL SPAM HAM S/O SCORE NAME 97268 79437 17831 0.817 0.00 0.00 (all messages) 27897 27881 16 0.997 1.00 1.00 local_META_TRIPWIRE_2 20596 20594 2 1.000 0.90 1.00 local_META_TRIPWIRE_5 10116 10115 1 1.000 0.64 3.00 local_META_TRIPWIRE_10 34514 34250 264 0.967 0.00 1.00 local_META_TRIPWIRE_1 OVERALL% SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME 97268 79437 17831 0.817 0.00 0.00 (all messages) 100.000 81.6682 18.3318 0.817 0.00 0.00 (all messages as %) 28.681 35.0983 0.0897 0.997 1.00 1.00 local_META_TRIPWIRE_2 21.174 25.9249 0.0112 1.000 0.90 1.00 local_META_TRIPWIRE_5 10.400 12.7334 0.0056 1.000 0.64 3.00 local_META_TRIPWIRE_10 35.483 43.1159 1.4806 0.967 0.00 1.00 local_META_TRIPWIRE_1 Results look good here. Bob Menschel ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
