Hello David, Saturday, January 24, 2004, 8:01:24 PM, you wrote:
DH> I've been playing with bayes on my home machine and have been very impressed DH> with it. I was however wondering to what degree everyone else trusts DH> BAYES_99? Is it generally accepted as a sure spamsign or do you expect ti DH> to be backed up by other scores I order to rank it as definite spam? I score Bayes-99 right at my required hits threshold. I not only use auto-learn, but even with auto-learn I hand feed just about every non-SATALK email into Bayes via sa-learn, after manual verification of the spam/ham status. Bob Menschel ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
