> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of David Hooton > Sent: 25 January 2004 04:01 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] BAYES_99 > > > Hi All, > > I've been playing with bayes on my home machine and have been > very impressed with it. I was however wondering to what > degree everyone else trusts BAYES_99? Is it generally > accepted as a sure spamsign or do you expect ti to be backed > up by other scores I order to rank it as definite spam?
I tend to trust BAYES_99 but have been plagued with BAYES_00 letting obvious spams through (the various popcorn/backhair/bigevil files have reduced this to a manageable level though). It seems to depend on what you're passing through it. I used to have to reset bayes once a week via a cron job, but the extra rulesets seem to have tamed it a bit. Tony ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
