[THIS LIST HAS MOVED! see http://useast.spamassassin.org/lists.html .]On Tuesday 27 January 2004 09:11 am, Dennis Davis wrote: > >From: Matthew Trent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: [SAtalk] Re: Meta-tripwire idea > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 08:06:41 -0800 > > ... > > >That would also help with the problem of the report exceeding > >Exim's header size limit when a ton of TW or BH rules hit. > > I suspect this is the problem, reported on the exim-users mailing > list, where the logs show: > > string_sprintf expansion was longer 8192 characters > > exim uses fixed length buffers. So it was suggest on the > list that the problem could easily be cured by editing the > source of exim. Edit exim/src/config.h.defaults and change the > STRING_SPRINTF_BUFFER_SIZE line to > > #define STRING_SPRINTF_BUFFER_SIZE (8192 * 2) > > or some other suitable increase in size.
Yes, but that seems like a workaround to me. Should SA really be outputting that long of a report? I could understand a long report if each rule was unique, but it seems like Too Much Information(tm) for such similar/related rules to each have output in the report. -- Matt Systems Administrator Local Access Communications 360.330.5535 ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ [THIS LIST HAS MOVED! see http://useast.spamassassin.org/lists.html .]