Hey folks,
Like a most of you I have received a lot af SPAM mails with faked Habeas
headers. Thus I adjusted the HABEAS_SWE rule and excluded their headers
from Bayes.
I haven't seen those SPAMs for days now -- thus I wonder if those
adjustments are still justified.
My question to you fellow SPAM fighters:
- Can you verify the end of this infringement?
- Is this just a coincidence?
All reports greatly appreciated. You can mail me directly if you wish
and I will post the results here. TIA
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
