At Tue Feb 3 08:48:23 2004, Ralf Guenthner wrote: > > Hi list > > I thought in the meantime I'd seen all variations of spelling this > infamous aphrodisiac beginning with V...but I was stunned by this ugly > spam that made it through my SA 2.60 with Bigevil, all the Backhairs and > trained Bayes and it only got a score of 0.1 (for being pure HTML) > > Does anyone have a suggestion how to raise scores on messages like this > the next time? I trained Bayes with it, of course and integrated the > alternate spelling in my V... rule, but besides that I'm at a loss right > now.
This is generated by a specific bit of ratware -- there are a set of common traits in the headers. I've submitted a set of rules for this to the bugzilla -- see bug #2992 at http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2992 Martin -- Martin Radford | "Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | men just upload their important stuff -o) Registered Linux user #9257 | on ftp and let the rest of the world /\\ - see http://counter.li.org | mirror it ;)" - Linus Torvalds _\_V
