Robert Menschel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > 1) Yes, sa-learn DOES deal with these emails, and does so > exceedingly well here. I call them "bayes fodder", since those random > words are teaching bayes that emails with those random words are spam.
Just to avoid confusion, you're saying that AFTER TRAINING, bayes works quite well for those messages, right? The key is feeding any messages that DO slip through into sa-learn as spam UNTIL you get those results, no? The "random words" question seems to come up frequently, and TRAINED bayes seems to be a good answer. > 2) I then augment bayes with the following rules: > [...] "Add-on" rules do seem to help get bayes there quicker! - Bob
