> -----Original Message----- > From: Pierre Thomson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 12:05 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Some real anti-bayes stuffing > > > This one would have got through, but it was caught due to > certain objectionable keywords (deleted). My well-trained > Bayes filter didn't complain a bit. It's obviously machine > generated text from lists of common ham words, formed into > crude sentences. We'll probably be seeing a lot more of this. > > Pierre Thomson > BIC > > > -----Original Message----- > > ... [deleted url and one-liner ad]... > > Whose soft kitchen is angry and perhaps the well-crafted > round-shaped camera got an idea. > Any round-shaped laptop spit. *snip more*
Upon further and more serious inspection I see what this is doing. For one, it defeats us using the rules that look for words without things like "the, a, and, is, was, as, of, ......." However I agree with Bob George. This is only for pure Bayes installs. I'm still not using it at all and catch 99.9% of spam. So this is a feeble attempt to stop us using Bayes Fodder as a tag now. It won't be long before someone sees a pattern on this as well. (Fred I'm looking in your direction!!....OK, I'm really looking at my shoes.) Look at how many sentances begin with "Any" or "is on fire" appears. I'm really not worried. I'm surprised it took them this long to figure this part out. --Chris
