-----Original Message----- From: Michal Szymanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:16:09 +0100 Subject: I can't believe this mail got 0.4 from SA!
> Hi, > > Can somebody try to explain to me how the below included message could > possibly go through SA getting the score of 0.4? And even that not > for the content but some date-in-the-past. > > Is it really so that vulgar words are NOT included in any of standard > rules? > > I'm really confused and embarassed. That's about the sum of it. Vulgar rules aren't included in any of the standard scores. I think the reasoning is SA is a SPAM filter, not a content filter. You can obviously write your own rules, but I've seen too many ways at obfuscating obscenitied to do any good (People saw me f.u.ck..ing..) to do any good. There was a discussion here about how to do this, and someone mentioned a subject with "See young girls getting raped." in the subject. I made the incorrect comment of "How often do you get a legit e-mail with rape in the subject?" Well.. quite a few women told me quite often. Evan
