At Thu Feb 12 05:04:55 2004, Ted Fines wrote:
> I just had a message tagged with DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K ("Date header uses
> unusual Y2K formatting").
>
> I have compared its Date: header with untagged Date: headers, and I can't
> see any apparently meaningful difference!
>
> e.g. The first one is the tagged one, the others were untagged:
> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 17:29:49 -0500 (EST)
> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 04:53:18 +0000
> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:35:29 -0800 (PST)
>
> What exactly is DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K referring to, and what triggers it?
DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K indicates that the Date: header is in a specific
format, the most obvious features of which are (a) the year is only
two digits; and (b) the timezone information is in the "three letter"
format (not +0000).
None of the dates shown in your mail are in that format. If they
were, they'd be:
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 04 17:29:49 EST
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 04 04:53:18 GMT
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 04 16:35:29 PST
Is it possible that your MUA is converting the Date header before it
displays it to you?
Martin
--
Martin Radford | "Only wimps use tape backup: _real_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | men just upload their important stuff -o)
Registered Linux user #9257 | on ftp and let the rest of the world /\\
- see http://counter.li.org | mirror it ;)" - Linus Torvalds _\_V
