Darn - premature send I think.
Anyway - maybe try the colon both places:
> > :0fw
> > | /usr/bin/spamc
> > :0
> > * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
> > ! spam
becomes
:0fw:
| /usr/bin/spamc
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
! spam
{^_^}
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Still the same oroblem, Mails are scanned recursiv and then
> the virus-scanner catches them:
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * AntiVir ALERT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> This version of AntiVir is licensed for private and non-commercial use.
>
> AntiVir konnte eine verdaechtige Email, die �ber Ihren Server geschickt
> worden ist, nicht auf Viren ueberpruefen:
>
> An archive attached to this E-Mail has reached the maximimum recursion
depth of 5
>
> Diese Email wurde nicht ausgeliefert und auf dem Server unter folgender
> ID isoliert:
>
> 01847-50DE16FF
>
> :-(
> J�zsi
>
>
> Am 19 Feb 2004 um 11:26 hat Steve Thomas geschrieben:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:16:11PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is rumored
to have said:
> > >
> > > THis is the whole procmail.rc
> > >
> > >
> > > :0fw
> > > | /usr/bin/spamc
> > > :0
> > > * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
> > > ! spam
> >
> > You're forwarding the message to a user called "spam". Take out the
exclamation point, so your recipe should read:
> >
> >
> > :0:
> > * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
> > spam
> >
> >
> > The extra colon after :0 tells procmail to lock the mailbox. If you
don't use it, you could corrupt that mailbox if two processes try to write
to it at the same time.
> >
> >
> > --
> > "I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work."
> > - Thomas Alva Edison (1847-1931)
>
>
