-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
John Hardin writes: >On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 06:26, Chris Santerre wrote: >> > > >> > http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/pipermail/mimedefang/2004-Febr >> > uary/020188.html >> > > >> > http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/pipermail/mimedefang/2004-Febr >> > uary/020203.html >> > >> > Any rules to catch this trick? > >> I saw this as a direct attempt to foil Bigevil and similar URL marking >> rules. Like Bayes poison (fodder) they are trying to mess up automated >> scripts from harvesting the correct URLs to blacklist. But I do these by >> hand, so I only pull out the legit URLs from these spam. >> >> So Short answers is I've not seen a rule for this. But I do have the legit >> URLs in my Bigevil for the ones I do get. BTW, could someone try something -- see if a mail with e.g. "via<a href=someURL>gra" matches the body pattern correctly. I'm guessing it will, but it's worth a test. If it doesn't, open a bug at bugzilla... - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFANmUCQTcbUG5Y7woRAh2vAJ9eeP9HXXlJu+RjJ0TNKXNX4xYTRQCeIzDH nVcj/uT+HvQuDpGVBLmY6RE= =59E4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
