Keith C. Ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bob George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > Actually the default boundary for the ham autolearning is 0.1, > not -2, so it can be dangerous. Of course if it were -2 you > would never autolearn much ham, unless you added a bunch of > negative-scoring custom rules.
Ah, thanks for the correction. I did NOT recall correctly. The defaults have worked well for me in any case. Are you saying 0.1 (default) IS dangerous though? - Bob
