LuKreme wrote:
[...]
I notice the nspam count is very low. I generally dump spam messages into a SPAM box and don't train on them because I thought that messages tagged as spam where automatically trained. Should I be running sa-learn against my known spam?
Autolearn will only apply if the message scores high enough, assuming it's turned on. The default is 12 IIRC.
I'd only been doing it against spam that was not correctly tagged by SA. (or spam that was incorrectly tagged, though that is very very rare).
That might explain the low count then. If you're training on the errors, it SHOULD learn correctly, but I believe a full initial training is still recommended to speed things up. Have you really only fed it that little spam though?
Everything may be ok, but like you, I'd be concerned about large numbers of spam getting "no tests" results. And I didn't see bayes scoring in your sample.
- Bob
