What happenes when you take that email to a txt file and run spamassassin -t -D < /path/to/the/email
? -----Original Message----- From: James Genus Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 11:06 AM To: Steve Dimoff Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: *Re: spamd not adding headers Not using qmail scanner, but I did install exiscan patch over 2 months ago....didn't hear any complaints at the time though... On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 13:50:34 -0500 Steve Dimoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This could be from 2 reasons I've seen / done. > > 1) Did you use a patch for qmail-scanner? IE did it have > sa-alt config flag? > > or > > 2) In your /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl what is > your"spamc_options" ? > > Mine is "my $spamc_options=' -f';" Remove the -c which > gives it a status code. > > Steve > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Anders Norrbring [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 10:52 AM > To: 'James Genus Jr.'; 'Bob Apthorpe' > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: SV:*Re: spamd not adding headers > > > As you can see, your example get tagged here... > > X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > X-Virus-Scanned: by Eset NOD32 at the-server.net > X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=9.9 tagged_above=3.0 required=7.0 > tests=DEAR_SOMETHING, LINES_OF_YELLING, > LINES_OF_YELLING_2, NA_DOLLARS, NIGERIAN_BODY1, > NIGERIAN_BODY2, NIGERIAN_BODY3, NIGERIAN_BODY4, > RISK_FREE, UPPERCASE_50_75, URGENT_BIZ > X-Spam-Level: ********* > X-Spam-Flag: YES > > > Anders Norrbring > > > > -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- > > Fr�n: James Genus Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Skickat: den 16 mars 2004 19:39 > > Till: Bob Apthorpe > > Kopia: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > �mne: ***SPAM***Re: spamd not adding headers > > > > Hi Bob > > > > A full example is below...as you can see there are no > > X-Spam headers... > > > > We're running SA 2.63.... > > > > Thanks, > > James > > > > > > > > > > > Morning all, > > > > > > I've been getting a number of messages do not included > > > the x-spam headers. When scanning the message via > > > spamassassin, it's tagged as spam correctly. However, > > > spamd seems to miss it altogether. > > > > > > I searched the archives and saw a few other posts > > > along similiar lines, but no definitive answer. > > > > It would help if we could see the full message headers > > (Received lines > > and X-Spam-Checker-Version, for example.) There's not > > much we can tell > > from partial headers and the message body. > > > > -- Bob > > -- James Genus Jr. 207-633-9600 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
