Jack
add in the rules from Chris's rules emporiam AND also check the archives for bayes buster rules...
-- Martin Hepworth Snr Systems Administrator Solid State Logic Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
Jack Gostl wrote:
I'm getting more and more spam that seems to be able to avoid the Bayes rules. Typically they contain hundreds of nonsense words at the end. I've gone from a false negative of less than one per 10,000 to where I get 10-15 each night. Has anyone else noticed this? Any suggestions?
This has me worried.
I'm on SpamAssassin 2.60.
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.
