> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darren Coleman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 5:34 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Depersonalising rule descriptions
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I just noticed this in the report of a spam I received received:
> 
> 0.3 MY_MISC_BODY           BODY: A few terms I don't like in body.
> 
> I appreciate this is from an addon .cf, and was most probably 
> written by
> someone originally for their own installation - but is there 
> any reason
> for having such nondescript and personalised descriptions for 
> the rules?
> I imagine its only a matter of time before a customer rings 
> up and asks
> me "what terms don't you like?".  
> 
> Wouldn't it have just been better to say something like 
> "BODY: Contains
> typical spam superlatives" or something?
> 
> I know, I'm just being picky and I do appreciate the great work Chris
> and others are putting into these addon rules. :)
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Darren Coleman
> JPC InfoNet Ltd
> Technical Consultant & Lead Developer

LOL, yeah that was one of my old babies. One of my first ones I ever wrote.
I was a noob back then. We are working on changing and standardizing(sp?)
all of this stuff. You may get more info then you could possibly hope for in
the future. If all things go well. 

Thanks for the heads up though. Shows you're paying attention. I may test a
few others by putting ads for Coke-a-Cola in my next descrition ;)

--Chris

Reply via email to