On 3/27/2004 at 1:56 AM, "Tom Emerson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 26 March 2004 9:26 pm, Kai wrote: >> - header semantics have been matched and tested with Sendmail-generated >> headers ONLY, sorry. I'd be most interested in hearing from people trying >> these rules on Qmail/Postfix/other servers. > So, how does this message look to you? I use postfix [SuSE defaults to this > now...] I see from my last post to this very list, the following header: > Received: from bigbro.local (adsl-207-105-40-84.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net > [207.105.40.84]) > (authenticated bits=0) > by smtpauth2-ext.prodigy.net (8.12.10 auth mps/8.12.10) with ESMTP id > i2QFRi4A128520 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:27:44 > -0500 > � > [Which is actually a fixed IP -- I'm one of the lucky "old farts" that has > had > DSL for ages now...] Of course, I'm relying on the fact that you are NOT > processing messages intended for this list :) >From the looks of it, it should work, if your 'example.com' host from the >rules is smtpauth2-ext.prodigy.net (are there additional hosts requiring alternate match in the regexp?), which I presume is the smart host (inbound MX) for your domain. bye,Kai
