On Monday, May 17, 2004, 7:02:04 AM, Chris Santerre wrote: >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Rupa Schomaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2004 12:12 PM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: bigevil fp? seattle photoworks >> >> >>"Christopher X. Candreva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> On Fri, 14 May 2004, Rupa Schomaker wrote: >>> >>>> Any reason in particular it is on the list? >>> >>> Because they spam. >>> >>> A lot.
> AAAHhhhhh! But I don't want any FPs on BigEvil. Damn!!! I'm off to think > about this one. I'm guessing with the future merge of Bigevil and > WS.surbl.org, maybe I will start a shammer list? If you like. I whitelisted photoworks.com in all of SURBLs. IMO the correct answer is to not list any partially legitimate domains, at least in SURBLs, and to get gray domains (those referenced in both spam and ham) to fix any spam problems they may have. Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
