> Wouldn't this provide an easy way for spammers to get around your filters? > I've seen spam come in with headers looking as if it'd already been scanned > (albeit somewhere else). Anyways, that's just my 2 cents. > ~J.C.
Not really, since I would only allow the non-processing of mails already equipped with X-Spam-Status: Yes... Ie. it would only skip processing mails already deemed spam. As it is now everything marked by system #1 as spam is actively let through, since SA doesn't think that the "Spam detection software, running on the system..." messages are spam... To complicate matters even more the mailserver is an MDaemon Windows thingy, which wraps SA setup in a "nice" Windows GUI. To put it in other words: 1) forget about configuring the mailserver to treat mails differently based on rules (a la procmail), 2) the mailhotel ISP is relatively clueless :( On the bright side, if they can't make it work I'll just have to switch. Oh the joy of paying for my services :/ - Uffe
