On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 16:53:09 -0700 "Kelson Vibber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >1) The Bat! (v2.11.02) > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > This looks like the only one you've listed that hits RATWR9_MESSID. The > rest of the examples you've listed have letters mixed in, which means they > would only trip RATWR10_MESSID. Sorry, i mixed them up, here are the proper strings: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Note that score: That's 1/9 of a point, or 1/45 of the score needed to > trigger a spam report on the default scale. In other words, this rule is > only a problem if you have legitimate mail that will otherwise score 4.889. > Have you seen any false positives caused by these (i.e. legit mail hitting > RATWR10 with a score of 5 - 5.111 or hitting RATWR9 with a score of 5 - > 5.802)? Indeed i understand that the score is very low. Although, i believe these two rules are not of ``high quality'' since they are too generic. They hit quite a lot of legitimate emails. No, i haven't seen a single false possitive due to these two rules. Though i still think they are too broad or generic rules.
