On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 05:42:32AM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote: > Have you got a working rpmbuild invocation that works for this? There still > seems to be some confusion between the 3.0.0 and 3.000000 numbering in the > spec file.
Yeah... I put up a pre2 set of [S]RPM files at http://www.spamassassin.org/released/RPMs/ Interesting... I just checked the SRPM to make sure the "rpmbuild --rebuild" thing works (I used the binary RPMs that came out), and it looks like the SRPM doesn't keep track of what the source filename is. <grrr> I used the bz2 version of the tarball which worked fine in the original build, but it complains on rebuild: error: File [...]/SOURCES/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.0.tar.gz: No such file or directory Ok fine, I put up a new p2 set of RPMs based on the gz version, but if anyone gets the old version and it complains, use the following commandline: $ rpmbuild --rebuild --define 'srcext .bz2' spamassassin-3.0.0-p2.src.rpm Have to find a place to report the RPM bug... > I can successfully build if I link the tarball to > SOURCES/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.0.tar.bz2 and apply this change to > spamassassin.spec: Yeah, the filename was changed from the internal version number (3.000000) to the 'display' version number (3.0.0). But that wasn't updated in the spec file pre-pre2 release. I fixed it for the next version. Sorry for the inconvenience. :( -- Randomly Generated Tagline: Dijkstra probably hates me (Linus Torvalds, in kernel/sched.c)
pgp6c0PpQfgRk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
