I agree... this is not a Bayes question. The problem is in the whiltelist setup, compounded by the fact that he is using AWL, so future mail from the same sender will now get negative points. I gave up on AWL long ago, since it so easily skews results when other rules misfire.
Pierre Thomson BIC -----Original Message----- From: Kelson Vibber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 7:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Anyone have rules for this? At 04:29 PM 7/9/2004, Jon Trulson wrote: >On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Evan Platt wrote: > > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-54.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAD_CREDIT,BAYES_10, > > FAKE_HELO_YAHOO,RCVD_IN_SORBS,USER_IN_WHITELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO > > autolearn=no version=2.60 > > Use Bayes... Haven't been seeing these in my inbox for a few weeks >now. Huh? He *is* using Bayes - it's right there, BAYES_10. And there's no way that training Bayes to get BAYES_99 on this can counteract USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO. Kelson Vibber SpeedGate Communications <www.speed.net>
