Has anyone run any corpus scoring tests on the SURBL lists? Now that there are multiple overlapping lists, should we start adjusting scores if they hit more than one list?
John Lundin brought this issue up on the MailScanner list. > His suggested settings are: > meta OB_SC_URI_RBL (SPAMCOP_URI_RBL && OB_URI_RBL) describe OB_SC_URI_RBL > Compensate if both spamcop and OB trigger > score OB_SC_URI_RBL -1.5 > meta AB_SC_URI_RBL (SPAMCOP_URI_RBL && AB_URI_RBL) describe AB_SC_URI_RBL > Compensate if both AB and SC trigger >score AB_SC_URI_RBL -1.5 >meta OB_WS_URI_RBL (OB_URI_RBL && WS_URI_RBL) describe OB_WS_URI_RBL > Compensate if both WS and OB trigger >score OB_WS_URI_RBL -1.0 The suggested scores on the SURBL site are: score URIBL_SC_SURBL 4.0 score URIBL_WS_SURBL 3.0 score URIBL_PH_SURBL 5.0 score URIBL_OB_SURBL 4.0 score URIBL_AB_SURBL 5.0 Any testing arrive at these numbers? <<Dan>>
