-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Matt Kettler writes: > At 04:10 PM 7/13/04 -0700, Justin Mason wrote: > > > >1) is it possible to disable spamd from binding to an IP address? even > > > >127.0.0.1? so that nobody can communicate to it that way. Though spamd > > > >should still be able to run network tests. > > > > > > No, because spamd only supports inet sockets for communication with spamc. > > > If it did not bind any IP nobody running spamc would be able to > > communicate > > > with it, not even you. > > > >actually -- I think --listen-ip would do that. Tell it to bind to just > >one interface with that. > > Actualy justin, that's exactly what he wanted to prevent.. I wanted it to > NOT bind. Not to an interface, not to a loopback, not anything in the inet > domain. > > So can you do --listen-ip 0.0.0.0 or some such to disable inet binding > entirely? > >actually, it does too support unix-domain sockets ;) > > Yes, I self corrected on that one. Does binding to a unix domain socket > disable inet binding? as far as I know, yes. > >...and, actually, in 3.0.0 you can log to file or to stderr. > > That's good to know. There are a few people, such as Dimitrios, who have a > legitamate use for it. However, my money is that 90% of the people who use > it are people who just don't know how to configure syslogd. :) > > >(Sorry Matt -- just had to catch you on those ;) > > Hey, I'm hardly perfect, although I am at least good. :) yeah, you got me on the first one anyway! - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFA9JtlQTcbUG5Y7woRAhchAKDcoubobQo6lspb6TUeU+HXqEc0VwCdH8+4 zI9IM2tspSe6LBJRzu7gBMg= =1azu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
