Sorry Loren, somehow must have missed your reply - could you please resend it - thanks..
> I replied to the original mail messages a couple of days ago, but he must > not have liked the response. His mailer is creating mails with at least 5 > different major spam signs, and the one he mentions above is only something > like 1.2 points of the total. Nah, I appreciate any answer :-) >> * 2.4 RATWARE_HASH_2_V2 Bulk email fingerprint (hash 2 v2) found However, the RATWARE thing is the biggest contributor and counts for 2.4 points. Avoiding that one would solve my prob, but I have no idea what exactly it does. >> 1.1 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_10 BODY: HTML: images with 800-1000 bytes of words This one also is just wrong (if I understand it correctly). The included images in the html just consist of the logo and one embedded sentence, < 35bytes. How come it can be analyzed that wrong? Or do I missunderstand the rule? Thanks again, Martin
