Can anyone think why a message from a private individual would ever contain '<img="http://' ?
I someone were sending a link to a website image and some of the recipients were on AOL one might do something like:
http://url/path/to/image.jpg <img src="http://url/path/to/image.jpg";> so AOL users would get the image instead of copying and pasting?
It's unlikely that anyone is going to send you a message with that particular construction, in your specific case, but I would suggest since you are talking about just your personal account that procmail is the way to deal with this, and not SA.
---begin IMG_TAG="<img=\"http://"; :0 * ^Content-type:.*(multipart|html) * B $ ?? $IMG_TAG image-spam ---end
That should work (untested)
Incredimail,
Isn't that the biggest load of crap ever? It makes Outlook look elegant. And yet I know gobs of BUSINESS people who just love it.
-- It's better to burn out than it is to rust -- Neil Young as quoted by Kurt Cobain
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
![http://url/path/to/image.jpg"](http://url/path/to/image.jpg"){kind=link}