On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 10:08:32 -0400, Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > *snip* > > >At nearly 500k record we'd definitely want to do this > >with rbldnsd. BIND is already getting pretty slow with lists > >approaching 100k records. For comparison, sbl.spamhaus.org > >has about 5k records, xbl has about 1.7 million records, > >list.dsbl.org has nearly 4 million records. multi.surbl.org, > >our largest production list has about 45k records. > > It keeps growning fast! > > > > > >How does anyone else feel about turning this list of sex sites > >into a SURBL? > > > >Jeff C. > > > +1 for me. Keeping it a seperate list is a great idea. Gives admins the > choice. Especially ISPs who may only wish to tag spam, but allow customers > to look at the occasional naughty boom boom kissy kissy :) > > --Chris
Has anyone got any FP stats on this data while using it in Squidguard? It looks like very useful data, but how is it managed? Could be very intresting data to have a trial of at least. -- Regards, David Hooton
