>-----Original Message----- >From: Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 3:47 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: SpamAssassin reviewed in InfoWorld > > >Haven't seen this posted so here it is... > >I just received the July 12th issue of InfoWorld magazine and they >compare SpamAssassin 2.63 with two other products based on it. > Article >can be read here ><http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/07/09/28TCspam_1.html> >
The accuracy rating is complete BS! They compare a standard 2.63 install to 2 products that get constant updates. For it to be fair they should have included SARE rules and SURBL. SA would have kicked the other software's butt! --Chris
