>> I am running Redhat AS 3.0 and SA 2.63 with sendmail and spamass-milter.
>> I will start by mentioning the following:
>>
>> - I am processing about 10,000 msgs / hour
>> - This is a dual proc 3.2GHz Zeon with 2G of RAM.  The system is not
>> swapping at all (based on vmstat)
>> - I have already fixed the UTF8 issue
>> - I am not running any external checks (have run with spamd -L and still
>> have the same issue)
>> - I have disabled the Bayes stuff (from the local.cf file)
>> - I am not running the auto white list stuff (from the local.cf file)
>>
>> Now for the fun part...  I am hitting loads of 10+ on the server on a
>> regular basis which makes sendmail back off (I know how to fix the
>> sendmail issue so please do not comment on that).
>>
>> I have tried everything I can think of to take the load off the system
>> but nothing is working for me.
>>
>> When I do a TOP on the system, this is what I see...
>>
>>  18:57:50  up 8 days,  3:29,  2 users,  load average: 9.37, 9.35, 9.38
>> 124 processes: 108 sleeping, 16 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
>> CPU states:  cpu    user    nice  system    irq  softirq  iowait    idle
>>            total   74.4%    0.0%   22.9%   0.0%     0.0%    0.0%    2.4%
>>            cpu00   76.1%    0.0%   21.9%   0.0%     0.1%    0.0%    1.7%
>>            cpu01   70.2%    0.0%   26.0%   0.0%     0.0%    0.1%    3.4%
>>            cpu02   76.7%    0.0%   21.1%   0.0%     0.1%    0.0%    1.9%
>>            cpu03   74.6%    0.0%   22.4%   0.0%     0.0%    0.1%    2.6%
>> Mem:  2061652k av, 1496032k used,  565620k free,       0k shrd,   84660k
>> buff
>>                     905668k actv,  258248k in_d,    8904k in_c
>> Swap: 2097112k av,       0k used, 2097112k free                  439292k
>> cached
>>
>>   PID USER     PRI  NI  SIZE  RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM   TIME CPU
>> COMMAND
>> 17262 mail      25   0  107M 107M  2400 R     7.9  5.3   0:01   2 spamd
>> 17298 mail      25   0  108M 108M  2400 R     4.7  5.3   0:00   1 spamd
>> 17284 mail      25   0  108M 108M  2392 R     4.5  5.3   0:00   3 spamd
>> 17286 mail      25   0  108M 108M  2392 R     4.3  5.3   0:00   3 spamd
>> 17301 mail      25   0  108M 108M  2412 R     3.5  5.3   0:00   3 spamd
>> 17295 mail      25   0  107M 107M  2392 R     3.4  5.3   0:00   3 spamd
>> 17333 mail      25   0  108M 108M  2392 R     3.4  5.3   0:00   2 spamd
>> 17319 mail      25   0  108M 108M  2416 R     3.3  5.3   0:00   0 spamd
>> 17310 mail      25   0  108M 108M  2416 R     3.0  5.3   0:00   1 spamd
>> 17314 mail      25   0  108M 108M  2416 R     2.9  5.3   0:00   0 spamd
>> 17330 mail      25   0  107M 107M  2412 R     2.9  5.3   0:00   0 spamd
>>  7944 mail      23   0  107M 107M  2376 S     1.2  5.3   5:03   2 spamd
>>
>> Does anyone have any suggestions on what I can try next?  Any help is
>> greatly appriciated...
>
> Hmm,
>
> I don't know what is causing your problem specifically, but I see one
> thing that is VERY wrong. Spamd should not be using 108M of ram, which is
> what seems to be happening in your case. Normally Spamd will use about 18M
> of ram per process. Find out why that is happening (I can only suggest a
> process of elimination) and you should be well on the way to finding what
> the heck is going on....a freshly started spamd should only be using about
> 18M of ram.
>
> A couple of others have had a similar problem with excess memory usage
> before although I don't recall what the reason was - extra rulesets with
> errors in them perhaps. Maybe they will see your message and respond.
>
> Also consider that 10,000 message per hour is a BIG load for a single
> machine of the specs you listed when running spamassassin, and depending
> on how you integrate spamassassin, and you may simply be loading the
> machine too much.
>
> You don't say how you're calling spamassassin but since you're using spamd
> and sendmail, I'll put two and two together and guess that you're calling
> spamc from procmail ? This is what I'm doing too, and we're starting to
> notice serious load issues now that the amount of spam is going up...

Arrrrrrrgh.... Serves me right for not reading your message properly... I
see that you're already using spamasss-milter....so just ignore anything I
said about procmail.... my other comments hold though.

Regards,
Simon



Reply via email to