Mailing lists like this one have known headers and sources, so can be caught
in procmail and bypassed around SA pretty easily. Local stuff you could
probably likewise set up to bypass things pretty easily.
A Spammer *might* try to get spam through by faking it out as list mail from
sa-talk, but that would be one balsy spammer. And a little tweaking on the
rule would end up with that trick not working anyway.
Loren
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kenneth Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "SpamAssassin Users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 4:43 PM
Subject: Re: SURBL tags Logwatch reports
> --On Tuesday, July 20, 2004 4:26 PM -0700 Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > The correct answer is to *not process* your spam-fighting mailing
> > list messages, log messages, or anything else that might
> > legitimately mention spammer domains with SpamAssassin.
>
> That makes sense, but how do I accurately identify those messages so that
> they evade the processing without letting forged mail through?
>
