On Wed, 2004-07-21 at 17:56, Asif Iqbal wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am using SA 2.63 + rules_du_jour and still this spam (forwarde mesg)
> slipped through
> it. Should I need to add a new .cf line to block this kind of spam. I am
> not reporting an spam, I am just assuming this is a know spam that my SA
> 2.63 failed to detect.
>
> Any help/suggestion to catch these kind of spam besides using sa-learn
> would be greatly appreciated
>
> Thanks
From:
<http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi?report=1;uri=lawful7322dryg.us;list=URIBL:ws.surbl.org;>
sharyxp.us
* URIBL: ws.surbl.org: listed [Blocked, See:
http://www.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/]
* URIBL: sc.surbl.org: not listed
* URIBL: ob.surbl.org: listed [Blocked, See:
http://www.surbl.org/lists.html#ob]
* URIBL: multi.surbl.org: listed [Blocked, sharyxp.us on lists
[ws][ob], See: http://www.surbl.org/lists.html]
* URIBL: ab.surbl.org: not listed
See http://surbl.org for info on how to implement, along with a serch
of the archives from this list.
--
Homer Parker /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
BOFH for homershut.net \ / No HTML/RTF in email
http://www.homershut.net x No Word docs in email
telnet://bbs.homershut.net / \ Respect for open standards
"Bill Gates reports on security progress made and the challenges ahead."
-- Microsoft's Homepage, on the day an SQL Server bug crippled large
sections of the Internet.
