I complained to the FTC about Word-Of-Mouth regarding all their crap (scams). Got, signed and returned an affidavid to them the other day. They are looking into procecuting them and are turning over the information I provided them to the US Attorney General for action. I encourage others to do the same - https://rn.ftc.gov/pls/dod/wsolcq$.startup?Z_ORG_CODE=PU01 and/or forward copies of their crap to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Normally I don't go to these extents but these jerks really pissed me off....
> -----Original Message----- > From: Todd Schuldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 7:48 AM > To: 'SpamAssassin Mailing List' > Subject: RE: ShareYourExperiences.com spam > > Actually it's a little more than that on the order of "smells > like a scam": > http://www.snopes.com/computer/internet/wordofmouth.asp > > Todd > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Martin Hepworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 4:33 AM > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: ShareYourExperiences.com spam > > > > > > Seen quite a few of these in the past - seem to be related to a pr0n > > organisation and harvesting email addresses as you say. > > > > some sort of scam to get you to register you and your friends email > > addresses from what I remember.. > > > > -- > > Martin Hepworth > > Snr Systems Administrator > > Solid State Logic > > Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300 > > > > > > Duncan Hill wrote: > > > On Friday 23 July 2004 10:16, Hamie might have typed: > > > > > >>Got a goodie today... Straight through SA... Only hits > were bayes_70 and > > >>CLICK_BELOW > > >> > > >> > > >>I've never heard of these people... Sounds more like an > email harvesting > > >>website than anything else... The site doesn't hit sorbs > either... Or > > >>Razor... > > > > > > > > > > http://groups.google.com/groups?num=20&hl=en&lr=lang_en&ie=ISO-8859- > > > 1&safe=off&c2coff=1&q=shareyourexperiences.com+group%3Anews.ad > min.*&btnG=S > > earch > > > OR > > > http://snipurl.com/7yng > > > > > > Add surbl capability and you should catch a fair number more. > > > > > > If you can restrict based on NS, you might be able to block them. > > > > > > > > ********************************************************************** > > > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they > > are addressed. If you have received this email in error > please notify > > the system manager. > > > > This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept > > for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean. > > > > > ********************************************************************** > >
