On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 21:37, L. Clayton Parker wrote: > On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 21:19, Bob McClure Jr wrote: > > > What version of SA? > > > > Have you done any retraining using sa-learn? > > > > "man sa-learn" for more information. > > > > I think it was 2.6. Nope, I haven't tried to retrain it. I never > "trained" it in the first place. I don't think the bayesian filters are > even turned on. > > However, I was wrong about the mail getting through at a setting of 10, > it was a fluke kicked out by a filter so that SA never saw it.
Okay, I have a partial fix. It is now letting messages through and 10 may be too high after all. It let through two messages that should have scored as SPAM but didn't. Except that there are no scores in the headers. I thought tagging is supposed to be on by default but I set the -t switch and still no header output. Lee -- L. Parker chief cook, bottle washer and sometime sysadmin cacaphony.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
