>-----Original Message----- >From: Daniel M. Drucker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 4:49 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: too many spamd children? > > >> What rulesets are you using? > >70_sare_adult.cf >70_sare_bayes_poison_nxm.cf >70_sare_genlsubj0.cf >70_sare_header0.cf >70_sare_html0.cf >70_sare_html1.cf >70_sare_oem.cf >70_sare_random.cf >70_sare_ratware.cf >70_sare_specific.cf >70_sare_spoof.cf >71_sare_redirect_pre3.0.0.cf >72_sare_bml_post25x.cf >99_sare_fraud_post25x.cf >antidrug.cf >backhair.cf >bagle.cf >chickenpox.cf >evilnumbers.cf >local.cf >misc.cf >settings.cf >tripwire.cf >weeds.cf > >(Updated with RulesDuJour) > >> If using blacklist.cf or bigevil.cf, don't. Install SpamCopURI, >> instead. See > >I was using bigevil, and at your suggestion (and at my noticing for >the first time how honkin' HUGE it is) I have removed it and have >added and successfully tested SPAMCOP_URI_RBL. > >Do you think bigevil was contributing greatly to my problem because of >its sheer size? > >Do you think I should get rid of any of my other rulesets? >
BigEvil will kick your servers butt!! :-) I haven't updated it in a while because I fear the next size it will be. Maybe today :) The rest of your rules are fine. When you update to 3.0 you may want to remove a few. But That will be gone over more when the final release of 3.0 comes out. --Chris
