Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sorry for the crossposting in advance: > > I gleaned this from the nanog list. Has anyone seen the latency > described or is it more of a CYA technique from someone?
No, but there's insufficient information to know whether there was a problem in 2.63 or whether it still exists in 3.0.0-pre3. Maybe "Joe" has an example he could provide to us (because we've _never_ heard or received anything from Barracuda to my knowledge). Maybe you can query Joe? As a customer, he can try asking for more information, for Barracuda to submit a patch to upstream, or lacking sufficient influence, perhaps he has an example. If it's something sensitive as in we don't want to post a potential weakness, then email me directly. Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/
