On Thursday 29 July 2004 22:27, Matt Kettler wrote: [ ... ]
> > From looking at the source code itself, no true DoS is possible this way, > although it may be possible for a spammer to reduce their chances of being > checked. I've kinda drifted OT there I think - I'd forgotten the thread was about DoS attacks. I was only paying attention because I've only just recently started using the SURBL plugin to SA 2.63 and I'm mightily impressed with the improvement of the detection rates, and so the few spams that are getting through I am giving a bit of scrutiny.
