Dimitrios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:so i think, why not take a look at the currently submitted logos...
100% agreement! I only wish we had more ability to publicize the contest and a longer period of time to wait because more and more great logos keep getting submitted.
i personaly like two of them: 1) 1.0.24. Janne Pitk__nen
excellent art, a little too serious, complex, and threatening for a logo
I have to agree. I hate to, I really like it, but it as a logo it's not clear enough.
2) 1.0.9. nGmedia / Ulf Edvinsson
also excellent looking, an early favorite of mine, but I think it's a little too unclear which type of mail is on fire
Not bad.
I really like the simplicity of 1.0.3's second logo, but I think 1.0.17(2) is my current favorite. I really like the subliminal "check mark" in the envelope and there's a good use of color. It's a clean logo that isn't too busy, cartoonish, or difficult to decipher.
I think 1.0.3 would be better if "spam" where in red with the black cross-hairs over it.
1.0.29. Javi Masa (especially the second image of pierced spam in red
which is new) is my favorite. Fantastic work!
I think 1.0.29 is too cartoonish and would prefer something more serious. When I have the SA logo on my ISP's "Email and Spam" webpage I want logos that look serious and not that look 'cute' in any way. If the logo looks cute I'm not likely to use it on a serious page.
1.0.25. Attis Bijlani - ClearFire Designs is also a good
"corporate-style" logo, it needs a bit more work, but the
concept is very good. It's just not enough "SpamAssassin" right
yet.
I think it looks too much like an AOL icon. And it doesn't say, to me, anything about the actual product. And what's the black oval in the middle supposed to be?
--
BUGS: There is no conversion specification for the phase of the moon." strftime(3) man page
