-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Matt Kettler said the following:
> At 03:58 PM 8/4/2004, Nicki Messerschmidt wrote: >> I'm seeking information about bayesian filters. I'm using >> spamassassin on our mail server with auto learning. No I was >> asked if a very uneven ham/spam ration of 1:10 does harm the >> filtering done by the bayesian database. >> Has anyone of you more information and/or experience on this >> subject? > The only situation you might run into is if you're severely > undertraining ham and overtraining spam, bayes poisoning might > start making nonspam emails score higher in the BAYES_ ranks. And the question is, when does the posining begin? Has anyone some reliable information about the approximate ham:spam ration at which poising would take place? Cheers and thanks for the replies so far Nicki - -- Linksystem Muenchen GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED] Schloerstrasse 10 http://www.link-m.de 80634 Muenchen Tel. 089 / 890 518-0 We make the Net work. Fax 089 / 890 518-77 PGP Keys: https://www.link-m.de/pgp/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1-nr1 (Windows 2000) Comment: Get keys at: https://www.link-m.de/pgp iD8DBQFBEgeW6zWc+bXuIEMRAgVaAKD21DsqLy2k4qUVOBf9c2pWyqkoewCgtZAS 9dKmaRrGAFTmRBv2Jtd3tdQ= =9SFL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
