Hi Michael:
We tried the new Bayes SQL DB system (with new empty tables) and the load was high. Then we tried using the site-wide Bayes DB that had been built by 2.63 and the load was high. We also tried it with Bayes off completely with no change so we turned that back on. Scans were taking as much as 30 to 40 seconds. Server load averaged around 6.00. Now that we're back on 2.64 scans are taking the more normal 1 to 2 seconds and the server load is under 1.00.
One thing I noticed was that the maillog showed more detail with 3.0 - it showed all the tests being done. Maybe the SURBL tests take too long or require too much memory. Also, is it possible that SPF is automatically enabled?
Here's an example:
Aug 5 06:07:29 mx10 spamd[9352]: connection from localhost.localdomain
[127.0.0.1] at por
t 49365
Aug 5 06:07:29 mx10 spamd[9352]: processing message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
eisp.biz> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0.
Aug 5 06:07:35 mx10 spamd[9352]: identified spam (25.2/5.0) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0 in
5.9 seconds, 3303 bytes.
Aug 5 06:07:35 mx10 spamd[9352]: result: Y 25 - BAYES_75,BIZ_TLD,CLICK_BELOW,CLICK_TO_REM
OVE_1,EXCUSE_10,EXCUSE_15,EXCUSE_3,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,HTML_20_30,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_FONT_INV
ISIBLE,HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TEXT_AFTER_BODY,HTML_WEB_BUGS,LINES_OF_YELLI
NG,LONGWORDS,MIME_HTML_ONLY,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,RCVD_BY_IP,RCVD_HELO_IP_MI
SMATCH,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,REMOVE_FROM_LIST,SEE_FOR_YOURSELF,URIBL_AB_SURBL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,U
RIBL_SBL,URIBL_SC_SURBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL,URI_REDIRECTOR,WE_HONOR_ALL
scantime=5.9,size=3303,
mid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,bayes=0.788341699558233,autolearn=spam
Best Regards,
Jeff Koch, Intersessions
