Hi there.
While upgrading to SA 2.64, I decided to take advantage of the newer versions of Mail::SpamAssassin::SpamCopURI which allow the use of bitmasked SURBLs. I figured this might provide a slight performance increase due to caching of SURBL lookups, so I created a new .cf file using the new syntax (see attached).
I did a little testing with my caught spam folder, and I noticed something odd--there seems to be a disparity between what's in multi.surbl.org and in some of the individual lists (sc.surbl.org, ws.surbl.org, etc.)
Is the multi.surbl.org synchronised dynamically to the individual lists, or is there some lag?
For now I've switched back to using the individual lists, but I'm wondering if there's an explanation?
---- Nels Lindquist <*> Information Systems Manager Morningstar Air Express Inc.
I had asked about a similar question a week or two ago, and got the impression that multi.surbl.org can only be used in SA3.0 due to the way that SA performs the lookups. I wanted to be able to use the bit-masked lookup since it is only one lookup as opposed to four or five as well.
Ryan Moore ---------- Perigee.net Corporation 704-849-8355 (sales) 704-849-8017 (tech) www.perigee.net
