On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 10:04:18PM -0700, Robert Menschel wrote: > I suspect that the "exists" version would be more efficient, use less > resources. I guess this because I believe SA identifies the headers as [...] > Can anyone confirm this? If so, I'll rework SARE_HEAD_SPAM into an > "exists" format for the release expected shortly.
Yes. "exists" is always more efficient than ALL with an RE, by far I would imagine. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "Something at infinity is infinitely far away." - Prof. Jasperson
pgpsKlWO8QmLf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
