Hello Rob, Monday, August 16, 2004, 9:55:35 PM, you wrote:
>> Can you give us an example of an easy one that got thru? With headers? RB> Good idea! RB> I also note that my message headers claim to be running 2.63, but rpm claims I RB> am running spamassassin-3.0.0-0.pre4.2.3mdk. Sigh. RB> I have also added SARE HTML 0 and 1, Header 0 and 1 and SARE_GENLSUBJ-0 and 1 RB> thanks to Bob's comments. But I would love to hear yours. I agree with Loren's statement about the version difference. You have Bayes enabled (per autolearn=no), but no BAYES results. It's possible you lost your Bayes database. I also don't see any network tests in your results. I find network tests make the difference in 1/3 to 2/3 of my spam. Header-0 and Header-1 should have kicked two of the three you posted over your threshold. Bob Menschel
