Quoting "Gustafson, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Has anyone had any luck configuring Spam Assassin for BAYES filtering ONLY? I am using SpamBayes in my Outlook program right now and it is like 99.9999% accurate, and I'd like to have similar results with Spam Assassin, but right now SA is coming it at closer to 40% accuracy. I'm thinking turning on only Bayes might bring up the accuracy a little.
Any comments would be greatly appreciated.
Defnitely use bayes. It'll help significantly. I'd also look into setting up surbl. http://www.surbl.org/ I guess you dont want to be running any of the network tests (razor etc)? I know the machine is heavily loaded but it may be worth a shot.
Weird seeing ya here
Jim
