Matt Kettler wrote: > At 02:43 AM 8/19/2004 -0700, Daniel Quinlan wrote: >>> Why did the below message get learned as HAM on a bayes_99? >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutolearningNotWorking > > Dan.. AFAIK that's an outright bug in spamassassin. One of the rules > of autolearning introduced in the 2.61 series is to never autolearn > anything that strongly contradicts existing learning (ie: never learn > a message as ham that would be bayes_99)... > > Did that intentional feature somehow get reverted out of 3.x? > > http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2437
That was my bug back then too. I really think that bayes_99 needs to be higher score, and that the Fix to not auto-learn as ham when bayes_99 is present needs to be put back in. This one slipped through with JUST the bayes hit. :( LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [email protected] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
