On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 03:18:15PM -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
> I've noticed that with SA 2.63/2.64, the subject line of a message properly
> gets "** SPAM **" added UNLESS the original message had a blank subject. In
> that case, the message comes through with no subject, although the original
> message is converted to an attachment, the spam reasons are displayed, etc.

This works fine for me in 2.64 in report_safe 0 and 1.

> Is this still an issue in 3.x?  Is it worth my putting in as a bug?

It works for me in 2.6x and 3.x.  If you want to test 3.0 yourself and
can reproduce the issue, feel free to open a ticket.  We're not going
to be doing any more 2.6x releases though, so there's no point if it's
not reproducable in 3.0.


Note: You specified "a blank subject", which is different than "no subject
header".  "Subject:" is what I tested per your comment.  Having no header,
however, is slightly different.  In 2.64, a Subject header will be added
and rewritten no matter what.  In 3.0, a Subject header is added for
report_safe 1, but not report_safe 0 (it's a header rewrite only).

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"I don't want to go back to using Windows...  It may be pretty, and easy, but
 it has no depth or soul.  It's like the one-night stand of operating systems.
 You feel cheap after using it." - From User Friendly, 07/26/1999

Attachment: pgpzed3WzVIsW.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to